In April of 2018, I wrote an article “How to use emojis in React”. At the time, the default eslint configuration for Create React App would flash an error if you put an emoji in a rendered string.
The answer was to wrap the emoji in a
span with some appropriate attributes to notify screen readers that it was being used as an image. Since it was React specific, I included a component that handles all the attribute logic for you.
The article gained some traction and, thanks to Medium’s SEO, remains the first page on a Google search for “use emojis react”. Later that same year, I decided to create and release a package for the included React component. Thus,
a11y-react-emoji was born.
There have been some maintainer highs and lows in that time, so here are the five biggest lessons I learned along the way.
1. Packages can be simple
Before stepping into the world of open source, I thought of packages as a black box. But I’ve since learned that they are much simpler than they appear.
package.jsonwith a few fields,
- and a
And the last two are optional. Once I got over the hurdle of publishing my first package, the curtain of mystery fell away.
Take a moment and look through the
node_modules/ of you next project, and you’ll see a bunch of directories with those files mentioned above. Not too scary!
2. Dependencies can get tricky
If you’re publishing a basic utility, you may not need to worry about dependencies. But the more complex your library becomes, the more tricky it becomes to manage your dependencies.
a11y-react-emoji was a shared React component written in TypeScript, which meant I needed to manage React and TypeScript dependencies. I wanted the component to be fully tested, so add Jest and Babel to the mix. Error checking? Add ESLint. Consistent formatting? Bring Prettier along.
Before long, your dependency tree can grow really big. Keep something in mind when creating a package: every dependency you add is another dependency that you have to be willing to manage. That can add a maintenance work to your package.
3. Security is a hassle
I’m not an expert on security. So when GitHub flags one of my packages for potential security risks, I still feel a chill run down my spine.
When I first created the
a11y-react-emoji, I was quick to address every security risk highlight, merge the changes, and release a new version of the package. Every time it felt like I was just a few clicks in front of the next Equifax data breach.
But after a few months at the helm, I stopped caring so much. Part of that is how the project is structured:
a11y-react-emoji has no dependencies, which means that no flagged security issues present a risk in production.
Every potential issue is within the dev dependency tree, which isn’t a big deal to the package user.
However, keeping a large-scale library with tons of dependency ahead of all security risks would be a nightmare. That’s not something I’m chomping at the bit to do in my spare time.
4. Leverage the community
Earlier this year, @bdbaraban filed an issue with
a11y-react-emoji concerning its types. I was just learning TypeScript when I wrote the library, and his suggestion was an improvement to the existing code.
I asked him if he wanted to open a pull request to make the change but quickly got antsy and did it myself.
That was a mistake. The beauty of open-source is the community; it’s the product of our collective intelligence. It didn’t matter that the current types for the package were limited. What would have been more important would be to wait and give someone else the opportunity to contribute.
To encourage more community involvement, you should include the following:
ISSUE_TEMPLATE.mdto standardize issues,
- labels for
- and contact information in the
When someone reaches out or files an issue, give them a few days to respond. Security bugs should be fixed immediately; features and small fixes can wait.
5. Don’t lose yourself
There is an undeniable high that comes from seeing your code used by someone else in the wild or stars the project on GitHub. I’m not immune; I’ve found myself getting caught up in that ever-growing download count since releasing the package.
It’s important to remember that your worth is not determined by the number or popularity of your open-source contributions. It has nothing to do with how many Twitter followers you have, claps you’ve received on Medium, or unique traffic to your personal website.
You are infinitely valuable for just being you.
If you want to publish packages because you think it’s fun or you want to help other people, then open source is a great way to contribute. But don’t lose sight of that motivation.
I hope those were helpful. If you have any questions about open source or want to share some tips of your own, please let me know.
Genesis 1:27 (SDG)